A number of Pennsylvania Turnpike officers have lost computer hard drives to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Last Thursday morning Oct 22, FBI officers showed up unexpectedly at the Turnpike offices in Harrisburg and apparently presented their authority (subpoena) to impound, examine and confiscate equipment and records as part of a criminal investigation. The agents returned and spent most of Friday at the Turnpike also. Nothing has been announced by either the FBI or the Turnpike.
Hypothetically speaking, if Abertis' $12.8 billion bid for a Turnpike lease was still on the table today, would the PTC still have the political clout to convince a majority of legislators to reject it? Rather than put the PTC out of business through a Turnpike lease (as I've argued should have been done), somehow a majority of legislators convinced themselves that a better option was to expand the PTC's power and role in state transportation funding. Smart move, eh?
For all state senators and reps who stood in the way of the lease I have one simple question—how's that decision working out for you?
For the USDOT folks currently evaluating the PTC's proposal to toll I-80—a critical lynchpin of the deal enshrining PTC's continued transportation monopoly, which was already rejected twice before by the Bush-era USDOT—I'd simply ask, can you ignore this? The Obama administration could certainly end up with no small degree of egg on its face if one agency (USDOT) were to approve the PTC's I-80 tolling plan while another agency (FBI) was investigating the PTC for corruption.
Bob Dietz, 55 of Lancaster PA, construction supervisor for a Turnpike widening project near Valley Forge says we can quote him as saying the FBI were at the Turnpike's head offices in Harrisburg Thursday afternoon and that they went away with computers and other materials.
Dietz says he has been providing the FBI with details of corruption in connection with a $170m six lane widening in the Valley Forge area. The job was originally bid at $90m, Dietz says. (We're checking this out - editor)
So it's "he said-she said" at this point. More to come as this story develops.
UPDATE 2: Nathan Benfield at the Commonwealth Foundation offers a similar take (with a dose of sarcasm) here:
But hey, it's not your father's Turnpike Commission (despite the number of patronage hires). Rampant corruption is no reason not to give the Turnpike Commission greater authority and control over I-80.
UPDATE 3: In my original post, I mistakenly wrote that Mitchell Rubin was "up on federal corruption charges," when in fact he is currently the target of a federal corruption investigation. I corrected this in the text above. My apologies for this error on my part, and many thanks to the reader who pointed it out.