« Green Divorces | Main | NFL Seeks State Involvement in Cable Programming Decisions »

December 10, 2007

iProvo Takes A Run at $2 million

There have always been those who are magnanimous enough never to say, “I told you so.”

Unfortunately, I’m not one of them. iProvo, the municipally-owned wholesale fiber optic system, has lost $214,000 over the first four months of its current fiscal year, which began July 1, Provo’s Deseret Morning News reported last week. That figure does not include the four payments of $100,000 made by the city to cover the shortfall iProvo had anticipated going into the current fiscal year. So, all told, four months into fiscal 2008, the operation is $614,000 in the red.

In a policy study Reason released 12 months ago, I predicted that the losses would continue, growing larger year to year. If they continue at this current rate for the rest of the fiscal year, iProvo’s 2008 cost will be approach $2 million--$850,000 on top of the $1.2 million already budgeted from city coffers. iProvo spent $1 million in 2006. All this for phone, cable and/or Internet services that Provo residents can get from either Comcast, Qwest, DirecTV or Dish Network, not to mention a bevy of local ISPs, at comparable prices.

iProvo reports that it has 10,236 customers, a goal that its business plan had required it to reach two years ago. Even then, 10,000 has not proven to be the break-even point it was expected to be. Lower revenue per subscriber plus an abysmal churn rate–140 service activations per month offset by 120 cancellations—frustrate any attempt to gain market traction.

Some of the proposed quick fixes are rather cynical. iProvo is seeking to add additional retailers. The idea is that they would flip their captive customers to the iProvo network, immediately boosting the muni’s numbers (at the expense of commercial ISPs now carrying the backbone traffic). And while Mayor Lewis Billings is loath to raise taxes to support iProvo, he and interim project director Kevin Garlick have said they might raise the rates city departments pay for iProvo services. Any resulting tax increase then, while not funding iProvo directly, will fund the ability of the city to do business with iProvo.

Billings says he has “31 key strategies” for iProvo. He needs only one: An exit strategy. This route might be the best way to salvage the city treasury, taxpayer wallets and perhaps his own administration.

The Deseret News said it best in an editorial (which cited the Reason study) the next day:

“By now it should be obvious that private businesses, faced with such losses, would consider abandoning ship. Provo is treading where only private business ought to go, and doing so badly. Telecommunications is a market demanding the nimble feet of private investors. Trends and technologies are constantly shifting.”

Posted by steve.titch at December 10, 2007 02:37 PM




Comments

Unfortunately, Mr. Titch, you're as full of half-truths as ever, especially for someone who wasn't even at the meeting in question. For starters, it is true that part of the plan is to have city departments pay more for services. That's true because city departments current pay nothing at all. It's absurd for the city to expect subscriber revenues to pay for the city's use of the network (not to mention their share of construction) and it's absurd of you to share that expectation. You also leave out what the city is doing with the network. The energy department slashed response time to outages by 25% by using iProvo to do remote monitoring. It also eliminated the need for a hotline to report such outages. The energy department also plans to install new meters capable of two-way communication. In the pilot area, they're expecting a break even in 7 years, then a savings of $42K per year for just 500 units. If deployed to all MDUs in the city, the savings could top $800K per year. Such a thing wouldn't even be possible without iProvo in place. This says nothing of the benefits of seamless telecommuting for city employees, rapid data sharing between city agencies, the instant monitoring of traffic conditions (especially important for a city that doesn't meet federal air quality standards)... in other words, a whole host of benefits to the city that they haven't bothered to pay for. You're so blinded by your ideological stance that you fail to see the entire picture.

Comment by: Jesse Harris at December 14, 2007 07:20 AM

---

Ò×ͨwow gold]¹«Ë¾ÊÇÇൺ֪ÃûµÄwow gold¹«Ë¾,Çൺwow gold,Çൺwow goldÉè¼Æ¹«Ë¾,Çൺwow goldÉè¼Æ6787671@WOWGOLDS.COM

Comment by: wow gold at May 11, 2008 03:46 AM

---

º¬Î÷²Øwow goldÒªÎÅ¡¢wow goldÐëÖªºÍµ±µØwow gold×îиæÊ¾¡£6787671@WOWGOLDS.COM

Comment by: wow gold at May 11, 2008 10:09 AM

---

googleÅÅÃû·þÎñ. googleÅÅÃûΪºÎÔÚÑÇÂíѷͶgoogleÅÅÃû

Comment by: googleÅÅÃû at May 11, 2008 12:53 PM

---

¾£³þwow goldÍø£¬¼´¾£³þÍøwow goldƵµÀ£¬Ìṩºþ±±wow gold¾°µã£¬Î人wow gold¾°µã£¬ÌṩÎ人wow gold¹«Ë¾£¬Î人wow goldÏß·£¬6787671@WOWGOLDS.COM

Comment by: wow gold at May 12, 2008 12:10 PM

---

°üÀ¨¹«Òæwow gold¡¢ÂÃÓÎwow gold¡¢ÉÌÒµwow goldµÈµÈ¡£È»¶øwow gold£¬wow goldÈÕ³£Éú»îÖÐËù˵µÄ¡°wow gold¡±ÍùÍùÌØÖ¸ÉÌÒµwow gold6787671@WOWGOLDS.COM

Comment by: wow gold at May 12, 2008 07:39 PM

---

ÖйúgoogleÅÅÃûgoogleÅÅÃû¹«Ë¾googleÅÅÃûÈËgoogleÅÅÃû´´ÒâÖйúgoogleÅÅÃû¹©ÇóÍø6787671@WOWGOLDS.COM

Comment by: googleÅÅÃû at May 14, 2008 09:39 PM

---

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Search


Recent Entries
Categories
Contact
Links
Blog Roll
Archives
May 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2