Google Reason
EMAIL UPDATES
Get Weekly Updates

REASON JOB POSTINGS
ANNUAL
PRIVATIZATION
REPORT 2007
PRIVATIZATION
WATCH
REASON MAGAZINE
TOPICS
SUPPORT REASON

Letter to the Editor

Bangor Daily News
October 21, 2005

Air Traffic Safety Intact
New flight services stations will save $190 million per year
By Geoffrey Segal


The editorial, "Wrong Flight Plan" (BDN, Oct. 14), is unfortunately misguided and uninformed.

Prior to the contract with Lockheed Martin, the technology used at flight service stations facilities was obsolete and very labor-intensive. However, most of the services they provide can easily be provided online, rather than by voice over the phone.

With the introduction of state-of-the-art equipment to maximize online services, the contract will save an average of $190 million per year. Even the principal private pilot group, Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, supported the competition from day one, and cheered the results in its publications and on its Web site.

As for the 2,500 existing staff, downsizing will occur with minimal layoffs. First, all current employees will be offered positions in the new consolidated facilities.

Second, about half the staff will become eligible to retire over the next several years, as the consolidation takes place.

Third, the FAA is encouraging those who are qualified to apply to become air traffic controllers (where thousands need to be hired over the next decade to replace upcoming retirees).

Finally, there are other vacancies within its Air Traffic Organization.

The United States is playing catchup to the larger wave of reform in air traffic control operations. Since 1987 a total of 40 air traffic control systems have been converted from a department of government to a commercial entity - including Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Italy and Spain.

Has safety been compromised? No. Indeed, in April a team from the Government Accountability Office reported that systems in Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom all have maintained safety, controlled costs, and improved efficiency.

All five have invested in new technologies that reduced costs by increasing the productivity of controllers and reducing delays, which generally resulted in lower fees for major airlines.

Geoffrey Segal
Director of Government Reform
Reason Foundation
Falls Church, Va.


  Printer-friendly

  Email This Page

Increasing Airport Capacity Without Increasing Airport Size
 » Full Text (.pdf)
 » News Release: JFK Has Room to Add a Runway, Reduce Delays
 » News Release: Doubling the Bad Weather Capacity at San Francisco International Airport

Congestion Pricing for the New York Airports: Reducing Delays while Promoting Growth and Competition
 » Full Text (.pdf)
 » Frequently Asked Questions About Airport Congestion Pricing (.pdf)
 » Press Release

Using the Revenues from Airport Pricing
 » Full Text (.pdf)


Evidence That Airport Pricing Works
 » Full Text (.pdf)


Congestion Pricing at New York Airports
 » Full Text (.pdf)


The Urgent Need to Reform the FAA's Air Traffic Control System
» Full Study (.pdf)


More Studies


Congestion Pricing Will, Indeed, Fly
 » Full Text

Airport Band-Aid
 » Full Text

Wasting Time and Money on the Tarmac
 » Full Text

Congestion Pricing Study Was a Team Effort
 » Full Text

Will Midway Lease Re-Start U.S. Airport Privatization?
 » Full Text

Solving Airspace Gridlock
 » Full Text

Air Traffic Safety Intact
 » Full Text



More Commentaries


Home Contact Reason Support Reason

© 2006 The Reason Foundation. All rights reserved.
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90034 (310) 391-2245
Please email feedback@reason.org if you have questions about this Web site.