Printer-friendly   Email This Page

APR Table of Contents

Download Full Report (2.7 Mb | .pdf)  » Intro [.pdf]  » Authors [.pdf]  » Letter from the Editor    [.pdf | html]  » Table of Contents    [.pdf]  » Federal Update    [.pdf | html]  » State Privatization    Update    [.pdf | html]  » Tax and Spending    Limitations    [.pdf | html]  » Emerging Issues    » Social Security Reform      [.pdf | html]    » Arctic National Wildlife      Refuge      [.pdf | html]    » Offshore Outsourcing      [.pdf | html]    » Improving Parks      Funding and Services      with User Fees      [.pdf | html]    » Contract Management      and Performance      [.pdf | html]    » Privatization Going      Postal in Japan      [.pdf | html]    » Military Housing      Privatization      [.pdf | html]  » Housing and Land Use    [.pdf | html]  » Air Transportation    [.pdf | html]  » Surface Transportation    [.pdf | html]  » Rail Transportation    [.pdf | html]  » Space Travel    [.pdf | html]  » Health Care    [.pdf | html]  » Water / Wastewater    [.pdf | html]  » Corrections    [.pdf | html]  » Education    [.pdf | html]  » Insurance    [.pdf | html]  » Developing Nations    [.pdf | html]  » Endnotes    [.pdf]

» Annual Privatization Report 2005

Insurance

State Accident Fund—10 Years Later

During the early 1990s, Michigan, like other states, faced a difficult recession and reduced state tax revenues. State officials desperately needed to save money and to generate more of it. Among other techniques, they used privatization, most strikingly in 1995, when they load-shed a state-owned and -run worker's compensation insurer, then known as Accident Fund of Michigan, from the government balance sheet.

Accident Fund (now known as Accident Fund Insurance Company of America) was sold to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan for $262 million, the largest such state-based privatization of its time. Previous to privatizing Accident Fund, the largest known state asset sale involved a $56 million power plant in Wisconsin.

Accident Fund should never have been a public entity in the first place. Other states left worker's compensation to private, for-profit businesses, and they still do today. But the seeds of Accident Fund's socialization were planted by the Michigan Legislature in 1912, when lawmakers passed a bill making a centralized worker's compensation fund possible.

Thus, the Accident Fund was established, and for more than 80 years, it was run independently of the government that had created it. As a quasi-state agency, Accident Fund had its own private employees, and it was run by people elected by policyholders, not appointed by bureaucrats.

All of that changed in 1989, when the Michigan Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to a 1976 ruling by the state attorney general that Accident Fund was a state agency, and that its employees fell within the state civil service system. Placing Accident Fund under state control had an almost immediate impact on its operations. In a 1992 article, "Selling off the Accident Fund," my colleague Lawrence Reed described the outcome:

The results were predictable: political manipulation of rates and staffing, and reduced competition in the industry as private insurers began to withdraw from the market. Because of civil service rules it has been difficult for the Fund to fill key positions with qualified experts. An unwarranted 20 percent rate cut ordered by the Blanchard administration and timed to impact the 1990 election resulted in a $53 million financial loss for the Fund that year.¹

Newly elected Gov. John Engler called for privatization of Accident Fund during the first months of his administration, and he fought hard to win the necessary legislative and legal battles to get Accident Fund back into private hands.

Or at least semiprivate hands. The winning bidder for Accident Fund was Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, an entity so regulated that it is practically an agency of state government. The Mackinac Center for Public Policy once compared selling Accident Fund to BCBSM to selling the state lottery to the University of Michigan.

The BCBSM enjoys tax-exempt status that competing firms do not, which effectively ensures that people who do not have BCBSM insurance are indirectly subsidizing those who do. Ideally, BCBSM would become an investor-owned, private, for-profit business—a step the company is legally permitted to take—and the state legislature would take other steps to free Michigan's insurance market.

In fairness, it should be noted that BCBSM's regulatory advantages may be offset to some degree by burdens, such as the mandate to insure companies regardless of health status. Still, some believe that the benefits of converting BCBSM to an investor-owned, for-profit business would be a net plus for insurance consumers.

Regardless, the sale of Michigan's Accident Fund was a slam-dunk for the state financially. It generated a large, one-time revenue hike for the state treasury, while it increased, by all indications, the quality of services provided to the fund's many customers.

There isn't a strong case to be made for government being in the insurance business (or most other businesses, for that matter). Just five states still operate monopoly worker's compensation agencies: North Dakota, Ohio, West Virginia, Washington and Wyoming. These states proscribe all competition for workman's compensation from private insurance carriers. Another 21 states operate worker's compensation agencies, but allow some form of private competition, just as Michigan did when the Accident Fund was a state agency.

While Michigan was the first to sell off its worker's compensation insurance agency, it was not the last. Nevada began working toward selling off its system as early as 1995, depending on how you define the start of the transition. In 1999 the state passed enabling legislation to facilitate the privatization of the worker's compensation agency.

According to a press release from Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn's office, doing so removed 500 people from the state payroll. As of January 1, 2004, state employers began receiving premium cuts of an average 12.4 percent. In addition, the state's taxpayers were no longer on the hook for $1.6 billion in unfunded liabilities. West Virginia is scheduled to convert its public system into a private, competitive one beginning in January 2006. Officials expect an initial average drop in premiums of 15 percent as a result.

State insurance is not required by the U.S. Constitution, and it was never required by Michigan's. The state was wise to divest itself of its insurance albatross. Others would benefit from doing the same.

By: Michael LaFaive, fiscal policy director, Mackinac Center for Public Policy

» return to top

Endnotes

» return to top